Skip to content

New: AI support assistants that resolve up to 65% of tickets automatically.See how

AISOFTAGENCY
Technology

OpenAI, Claude or Gemini? How to Choose an LLM Provider for Your Product

Benchmarks and headlines won't pick the right model for you. A practical, criteria-based process for selecting — and future-proofing — your LLM stack.

Tomasz NowakTomasz NowakLead AI Engineer2 min read
OpenAI, Claude or Gemini? How to Choose an LLM Provider for Your Product

OpenAI, Anthropic's Claude and Google's Gemini all offer powerful models, and new versions arrive every few months. Choosing between them based on headlines or leaderboards is a mistake. The right choice depends on your use case, your data and your constraints — and it will change over time.

Evaluate on your own tasks

Public benchmarks rarely reflect your product. Build a small evaluation set from real examples — fifty to two hundred representative inputs with expected outputs — and score each model on accuracy, format compliance and tone. This single step prevents most costly mistakes.

The criteria that matter

  • Quality on your tasks — measured with your evaluation set, not marketing claims
  • Latency — especially for chat and interactive features
  • Cost at your volume — including input and output tokens and caching options
  • Context length — how much information each request must include
  • Structured outputs and tool use — reliability when calling functions or returning JSON
  • Data handling — retention, training policies, regional hosting and compliance commitments
  • Reliability and support — rate limits, uptime history and enterprise agreements

Match models to jobs

Many production systems use more than one model. A larger model handles complex reasoning or long documents, while a smaller, faster model classifies intents, extracts fields or routes requests. Matching model size to the task often cuts costs dramatically without affecting quality.

Design for change

  • Put a thin abstraction layer between your application and model APIs
  • Version prompts, tools and evaluations alongside your code
  • Log inputs, outputs and costs so providers can be compared with real data
  • Add automatic fallbacks for outages and rate limits

A practical selection process

  1. Define success metrics and build an evaluation set
  2. Shortlist two or three models that meet your data and compliance requirements
  3. Run the evaluation and review failures by hand
  4. Estimate cost and latency at expected volume
  5. Launch with monitoring and re-evaluate every quarter

The best model is the one that performs reliably on your tasks, within your budget and your data rules — and you should expect that answer to change.

  • #AI
  • #LLM
  • #Technology
Tomasz Nowak
Written byTomasz NowakLead AI Engineer

Insights, not noise.

One practical email a month on AI, product and growth. Unsubscribe anytime.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Let's build what's next

Have a project in mind?

Tell us where you want to go. We'll map the fastest route there — design, engineering, growth and AI included.