Choosing how to build your website shapes everything that follows: how fast pages load, how easily your team publishes, which integrations are possible and how much you'll spend over the next five years. There is no universally best option — only the best fit for your goals, team and growth plans.
The three common approaches
Site builders
Tools like Webflow, Framer and Squarespace let you launch quickly with minimal technical overhead. They're excellent for early-stage companies and campaign microsites, but can become limiting when you need complex integrations, custom logic or strict performance budgets.
Traditional CMS
Platforms such as WordPress combine content management and presentation in one system. Their plugin ecosystems are vast and many marketers already know them. The trade-off is maintenance: plugins, themes and security updates accumulate, and performance often degrades as sites grow.
Headless architecture
A headless setup separates content from presentation. Content lives in a CMS or database, while a modern framework like Next.js renders fast, secure pages and connects to any system through APIs. It requires more engineering upfront but offers the most flexibility, speed and long-term control.
A side-by-side comparison
| Criteria | Site builder | Traditional CMS | Headless (Next.js) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Time to launch | Days to weeks | Weeks | Weeks to months |
| Performance ceiling | Good | Variable | Excellent |
| Custom integrations | Limited | Plugin-dependent | Unlimited |
| Maintenance effort | Low | Medium to high | Medium |
| Best for | Small sites and campaigns | Content sites with standard needs | Scaling companies and complex products |
Questions to answer before you decide
- Will the website integrate with your CRM, product, booking or payment systems?
- How many people publish content, and do they need approvals or multiple languages?
- How much of your revenue depends on search rankings and page speed?
- Do you have — or plan to have — developers who can own the codebase?
- What will the site need to do in three years, not just at launch?
Our recommendations
- Validating an idea or running a campaign? A site builder gets you live fastest.
- Content-led business with standard needs? A well-maintained CMS is a pragmatic choice.
- Growth depends on performance, integrations or product experience? Go headless.
Many of our clients choose a hybrid: a headless marketing site with a tailored CMS their team can manage, sharing components and design tokens with their product. Publishing stays simple while engineering keeps full control where it matters.
Pick the stack for the business you're becoming, not only the website you need this quarter.
- #CMS
- #Next.js
- #Web development
Marcus WebbInsights, not noise.
One practical email a month on AI, product and growth. Unsubscribe anytime.
